Five thousand more Climategate emails have just been released on a Russian web site. PR trouble is on the way for Al Gore, Phil Jones, Michael Mann, James Hansen, and the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC), etc.
… all your favourite Climategate characters are here, once again caught red-handed in a series of emails exaggerating the extent of Anthropogenic Global Warming, while privately admitting to one another that the evidence is nowhere near as a strong as they’d like it to be.
In other words, what these emails confirm is that the great man-made global warming scare is not about science but about political activism.
Delingpole then lists a few excerpts from the latest Climategate emails. Among them are these:
/// The IPCC Process ///
<1939> Thorne/MetO: Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a
wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the
uncertainty and be honest. Phil, hopefully we can find time to discuss these further if necessary [...]
<3066> Thorne: I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run.
<1611> Carter: It seems that a few people have a very strong say, and no matter how much talking goes on beforehand, the big decisions are made at the eleventh hour by a select core group.
<2884> Wigley: Mike, The Figure you sent is very deceptive [...] there have been a number of dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and by IPCC [...]
<4755> Overpeck: The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guid[e] what’s included and what is left out.
<3456> Overpeck: I agree w/ Susan [Solomon] that we should try to put more in the bullet about “Subsequent evidence” [...] Need to convince readers that there really has been an increase in knowledge – more evidence. What is it?
<0714> Jones: Getting people we know and trust [into IPCC] is vital – hence my comment about the tornadoes group.
<3205> Jones: Useful ones [for IPCC] might be Baldwin, Benestad (written on the solar/cloud issue – on the right side, i.e anti-Svensmark), Bohm, Brown, Christy (will be have to involve him ?)
This is just a little sampling of thousands of newly-released emails from the gurus of “climate change.” The fun has just begun.
Climate realists are combing through these emails to find more proof that the “climate change” activists are dishonest and pursuing political agendas that have more to do with global government than dealing with any real climate change crisis.