Oklahoma Officials Challenge EPA On Scrubber Regulations

 

Oklahomans can expect a 20% rise in electricity costs, thanks to the EPA.

The Heartland Institute reports on the battle between Oklahoma officials and the bureaucrats at the EPA over regulations that will force two large utilities to spend $800 million on emissions scrubbers.

The scrubbers will result in higher utility costs for all consumers – as much as 20% above current costs.

According to Kenneth Artz, a commentator with Heartland:

EPA claims the scrubbers are necessary to reduce haze and improve visibility at national parks and wilderness areas and protect the public from pollutants coming from power plants.

“Controlling emissions that improve visibility also prevents health risks including increased asthma symptoms and premature death,” the EPA said in a prepared statement.

Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt has announced plans to appeal the EPA mandate, which the Agency handed down on Dec. 13.

H. Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis, says the EPA mandate has little to do with visibility limitations in national parks or health risks.

“It’s about power, shifting the power from the states where Congress and the courts have placed it, to executive agencies where this President wants it to satisfy his radical environmental constituency,” Burnett said.

“It’s [also] about stopping the use of coal,” Burnett added. “The administration has a war on coal from the mine to the power plant. The coal industry is under assault.”

“These regulations would be bad any time but especially in the current economic conditions. Even if the economy is currently on a slight economic upturn, higher energy prices could easily send it back into a tailspin. Because of their harmful effect on the economy, these regulations at this time seem especially counterproductive for an administration that claims jobs are its ‘first, second, and third concern,’” said Burnett.

Read more at The Heartland Institute.

 

 

 

Related posts:

  1. IER Identifies Coal Fired Power Plants Likely To Close As Result Of EPA Regulations
  2. Energy Expert Decries EPA’s Electricity-Destroying Power Plant Regulations
  3. Businessmen Lament Federal Regulations – Including EPA
  4. Despite EPA Claims, Regulations Destroy Jobs
  5. Judge Sides With Coal Industry In EPA challenge

Comments

  1. Guest says:

    Good for Scott Pruitt! It is way past time to rebuff the EPA. They need pushing back several years!!!

  2. John Stewart says:

    If the EPA, as a whole, had a brain once, they seemed to have lost the function of it years ago. Kudos to Oklahoma for the good work.

  3. Eddie says:

    It's about time someone finally grew a pair of stones to stand up to the EPA! I mean, really, these clowns in the EPA are on a power trip. Give a little person some authority and it goes to their head (yes, I'm talking about Lisa Jackson). I say civil disobedience is called for by the power companies. Refuse to comply, and refuse to shut the power plants down if need be. I am happy that the great state of Oklahoma is standing up for it's citizens, and it's businesses.

  4. ConservaDave says:

    And Obama is "for" the middle class as he shafts us more and more. I like the corporate civil disobedience idea. They should organize and in mass refuse to cooperate. What's Obama going to do? Call out the FBI and military on them? Oh yeah, Clinton already tried that in Waco…

Speak Your Mind

Connect with Facebook

*